UNOLS Ad-hoc Committee to Address the Impact of Budget Reductions on Fleet Operations

An Ad-hoc committee of Marcia McNutt (Chair), Eileen Hofmann, and Denis Wiesenburg has been formed by the UNOLS Council to address the budget concerns identified in Larry Clark's (NSF) letter dated 2/25/05 and make recommendations. A copy of Larry Clark's Letter is available at <http://www.unols.org/meetings/2005/200503cnc/200503cncap03.pdf>. The ad-hoc committee will work to develop a plan for ship lay-ups or retirements that will fit the budget realities and minimize impact on funded scientific programs. With input from the Ship Scheduling Committee, the UNOLS Office, and Agency representatives, they will:

  1. Determine a best estimate of the UNOLS fleet utilization based on funded science by class, by region/season, by special requirements.
  2. Estimate the ship operation funding from all sources. Evaluate the probability of NOAA funds and additional Navy funds.
  3. To the extent that the funds available do not meet the operational needs, develop a plan for ship lay-ups that will fit the budget realities and minimize impact on funded scientific programs. This plan should take into consideration longer term issues such as the impact of retirements versus lay-ups or the various forms of lay-ups ("ready to go" versus mothballed) and funding prospects in the out years (Observatories). Marine Superintendents and Directors should be asked to recommend a lay-up process. The cost of lay-up scenarios should be provided.
  4. Prior to submittal of the plan (both short-term and long-term), the ad-hoc committee's recommendations shall be circulated to the UNOLS Operator Institutions for review and comment. The ad-hoc committee will consider all comments and revise the recommendations, as they see appropriate.
  5. Submit the plan for approval by the UNOLS Council. The plan should provide the following:
    1. A short-term recommendation to address the 2006 budget shortfall. Recommendations for ship lay-ups should include a 3-year lay-up rotation schedule. The short-term recommendation should be provided to the UNOLS Council by June 1st.
    2. The plan should also provide long-term scenarios (3 years) for ship lay-ups and retirements. Recognizing that future budget projections are unavailable, various scenarios should be developed to address the possibility of level and declining budgets. The costs and operational impacts associated with the various scenarios should be articulated in the plan.
    3. Lastly, the plan should define a process for annual evaluations to ensure that fleet size and composition is appropriate to meet budget projections and funded ship time demands.
    4. Long-term recommendations and the process for annual evaluations should be provided to the UNOLS Council by August 31st.

     

BACK