Time Domain Reflectometer
Originated on July 24, 2001
Originated from Chris Riffe
on July 24, 2001
Hello:
I trust you are all
very busy; and so will appreciate your reponses all the more.
I would like to
purchase a Time Domain Reflectometer to check our EM cables
(the standard UNOLS assortment). Has anyone suggestions, preferences, warnings,
or pertinent anecdotal information.
Thank you all.
Chris Riffe
Technical Supervisor
Louisiana
Universities Marine Center
8124 Hwy 56
Chauvin, LA
70344
Reply from Marc Willis on July 25, 2001
Chris,
Marc
Marc
Willis
Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences
Oregon State University
104 Ocean Admin. Building
Corvallis, OR 97331-5503 USA
Reply from Dale Chayes on August 12, 2001
Chris,
I've used a number of
TDRs over the years but never owned one. Nearly every
time I've used a borrowed one, the battery was dead. The older Tektronix TDRs won't run without either a charged battery or external
DC power.
It took me a while to
understand the message: no one in our business has enough use for one to keep
it charged! I subsequently discussed this with Tony Bogeman
(MPL/Deep Tow engineer, retired) and he said ".... don't need
one...." and showed me how to make a very acceptable measurement with a
scope and a decent pulse generator. You get an estimate of characteristic
impedance as a by product.
We could put this on
the agenda for RVTEC if anyone is interested.
The magic part is not
really in the TDR, it's in the (usually) non-existent docs for the cable: what
is the propagation velocity (coefficient) for this cable (when it was working
right.)
A slightly different
issue is that the commercial units that I know about either do very long cables
(kilometers- for telecom work) or very short ones (meters- for complex wiring
harnesses) but not both. You can't easily resolve which end is the problem and
then figure out which connector/slipring/deck/umbilical
cable is at fault with a single instrument.
Finally, they won't tell
you anything useful (that I know about) for cables that have suffered a bit of
leakage or shield deterioration and thus have compromised high frequency
attenuation but still have good continuity and no big impedance mis-matches. You need to sweep the cable to figure this one
out if it matters in your case.
-Dale
Senior Staff
Associate
Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory of Columbia University
Reply from Rich Findley on August 12, 2001
Some years ago I
wanted to buy a TDR for testing conductor cables, so I had the Tektronix sales
engineer come out to demo several of the TDRs they
had. I used an old piece of .322 that was severely rusted with broken
armor strands. I don't remember how long the cable was but it was
representative of what we wanted to test. I picked a spot in the middle
of the cable, and tried physically damaging while the sales rep tried to
identify a problem with the cable. I crushed the cable in a vice but he
couldn't detect the fault. His conclusion was the cable so "lossy" that it would be impossible to detect the
problem using a TDR. I don't remember
the model number but it was somewhere around $8,000 around 10 years ago.
Richard Findley
Scientific Liaison
University of Miami,
RSMAS/
Harbor Branch
Oceanographic Institution
5600 US One North
Fort Pierce FL 34946